Soul Cynic
Do Synched Lips Sink Ships?
It's an age-old question--does lip-synching make you less of an artist? There has been instance after instance of lip-synched performances in the past; sometimes it's necessary, and sometimes it's not. Let's get some clarity on this issue, once and for all.
Let's face it--there are occasions when using a pre-recorded vocal is
necessary: a dance-intensive performance, for example. Other times, a
mouthed performance lends itself to certain television programs (live
or taped). It really depends on the nature of the show. I recall
watching Soul Train as a kid, and it never really occurred to me that the performer's vocals sounded exactly like
it did on the record. Back then, it didn't really matter to me--I was
simply caught up in the overall experience. However, as an adult, it's
evident that the "live or Memorex" question can sometimes distract you
while watching them perform, especially if the artist is not faking it well.
Then in other cases, you can't help but wonder why someone standing
almost motionless in a gown has to sing to a pre-recorded track. And
what about those who never seem to sing live? Don't you get
PAID to do this? No matter the situation, you have to look at it on an
individual basis. We just have to be mindful of the fact that
lip-synching is justifiable, but not always.
To be honest, lip-synched performances don't bother me for the most
part. As long as you are doing it well and giving me everything else,
I'm good. What actually gets on my nerves more is when a hip-hop artist
is rapping out loud to a pre-recorded vocal. Nine times out of ten,
that sounds like a sizzling mess. It does nothing to
enhance things. Couple this with the fact that there's also a
blithering hype man on stage doing ad-libs and what not. It ends up
sounding like some horrible drunken version of a rap song. For real, step your mic game up.
So what does this say for artistry? Has technology made the live raw
vocal a thing of the past? Would you rather hear a flawed (but
authentic) live vocal performance, or an excellent (yet pre-recorded)
one? Is it wrong to demand more from our beloved vocalists?
Tags: lip-synch, milli vanilli, soul train
Comments
Its one thing to lip on a show like soul train. Back then we didnt know what a lot of the artists looked like without an lp out. Today we know all these jive artists by site and they still dont bother to lip worth a damn. And turning your head to cover the fact that you dont know your lyrics is a played move!
bogart4017 | April 7, 2009 4:28 PM | Permalinkwhy thank you, Jennifer :O)
dar | March 18, 2009 9:31 PM | PermalinkKudos to who ever came up with that headline! lol
Jennifer | March 18, 2009 7:07 PM | PermalinkSome of the defining artists, specifically in black music, lip synched on prominent shows like Solid Gold, Soul Train, etc. and even though we knew they could sing, it didn't take away from their art. I think that there is a more negative conotation now due to how it has become a fallback for laziness in overall popular music, but again...all perspective I suppose.-QH
QH | March 18, 2009 3:12 PM | PermalinkImagine, actual vocals from a vocalist? Keep that up and there's a real risk you may get a performance from a Performer, another dangerous precedent. What's next? Plumbers plumbing? Teachers teaching?
Nonplussed | March 18, 2009 12:20 PM | PermalinkWhere will this end? Anarchy!
Like you I believe there are times when lip sync is necessary such as in live performances with heavy dance routines or broadcast shows that request it be done that way. In no way at all should a rapper ever lip sync ever!!!! That is the worst!!! Singers get a pass sometime but even they should have a track record of a great live show so by the time they're forced to lip sync we (the supporter/listener/fan) know they're official.
Olskool Ice-Gre | March 18, 2009 11:54 AM | Permalink